UTRGV / COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE / MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

TEAM 6: Design of a Lifting Attachment for Riding Lawnmowers

A group of men standing in a room

Description automatically generated

 

SDI Students (L-R)

·         Eurid Rodriguez

·         Carlos E Davila Hernandez

·         Luis D Rodriguez

·         Ruben Cardenas

·         Samantha Zuniga (not shown)

Collaborators NVC Team 5

·         Andrea Perez

·         Josue Camacho

·         Sebastian Melendez

·         Jesy Martinez

·         Ramiro Cauntu

·         Karla Rubio

Faculty Advisor(s)

·         Dr. Rogelio Benitez

Course Instructors

·         Dr. Noe Vargas Hernandez

·         Mr. Greg Potter

 

 

INDEX

WELCOME

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WE ARE TRYING TO SOLVE?

IMPORTANT TO KNOW

WHY IS THIS PROBLEM IMPORTANT?

OUR PROPOSED SOLUTION

FROM IDEA TO REALITY

PROTOTYPE EARLY AND OFTEN

FINAL PRODUCT

FUTURE WORK

CONCLUSION

LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR DESIGN PROCESS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

FEEDBACK

 

WELCOME!

Welcome! We are team # 6 “The Raptors”, Eurid, Carlos, Luis, Sam, and Ruben worked on this project during the Spring and Fall 2024 semesters with faculty advisor Dr. Rogelio Benitez. Our project is a lifting attachment for riding lawnmowers, aka The Yard Master Lawn Lift Pro kit. The hard-hitting problems we tackled were that of introducing a robust and innovative product to allow horizontal movement in low to medium work areas, allowing movement of heavy material with minimal labor. We hope you enjoy this project as much as we did.

Senior Design Website presentation UTRGV MECE 4361

Watch the Welcome Video!

 

 

Back to INDEX.


 

WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WE ARE TRYING TO SOLVE?

The project is aimed to solve the problems associated with common lifting and moving machinery, like forklifts or pallet jacks, and to limit possible pains associated with manual labor. These problems show up when the equipment or vehicles are placed in a non-static environment where they simply are not designed to function, and if they are they are designed for work in heavy duty working areas they are not manurable and or cost effective. This creates a void where a small-scale, light-duty device or vehicle designed to lift with minimal labor would fit perfectly. We are simply trying to fill that void where manual labor falls short and heavy machinery begins to play a role.

The classic idea of a forklift is tied to industrial or large commercial settings where large and heavy materials are moved constantly. Forklifts are [1] rarely seen in any light duty or small-scale use; this is the area where our attachment would work and stand out. The limitations mentioned are not related to the max loads they can carry or their durability, their limitations are that of size, cost, moveability, and genera access.

 



 

 

 

 

 

Back to INDEX.

 

 

IMPORTANT TO KNOW

To [nv1] better grasp the ideas that would be implemented in the design and to better understand fundamental topics related to our product the following background research was conducted.

·         Forklift safety regulations

·         Load stability

·         Power distribution

·         Lifting mechanisms

·         Competitors

·         Injury Statistics

 

Safety regulations for Forklifts

Forklifts are considered powered industrial vehicles and are commonly used for material handling and lifting operations. Since the occupational safety and health administration (OSHA) considers a forklift to be a powered industrial truck (PIT), the operators of a forklift must follow the safety regulations placed by OSHA.

 

Load stability

Load stability refers to the ability of a load to maintain its structural integrity and balance during handling, transportation, and storage. Operating a forklift does not only require you to understand the controls on how to operate it. It also requires an understanding of load stability, which may help prevent future accidents. There are several different factors that might come into play when dealing with the stability of a load.

 

Lifting mechanisms

Conventional forklifts work with two types of lifting mechanisms. One of these is the Hydraulic System, which uses cylinders, pistons and fluids to lift and lower the loads placed on the forklift. The other mechanism is the Roller Chain Pulley, which uses a pair of gears and a pulley system to lift loads. But there are no limitations on the lifting mechanism, as a team explored other types of mechanisms to understand the limitations, weaknesses and strengths for a better understanding and a better and justified final choice.

 

Moveability

Moveability refers to the forklift's ability to move throughout its environment which is typically that of solid ground and level surfaces and only allowing for [4] slight variation as to not throw off its center of gravity in turn unbalancing the machine. This is crucial to the project and its safety for the user, if this aspect were to not be taken into consideration, then the project would simply be a nice piece of modern art.

 

Competitors

Competitors for this product are also important to know and understand, below are the most prominent products with their advantages and disadvantages. Considering that the competition is vast and varied, generalized groups are listed.

·         Forklifts

·         Pallet Jacks

·         Hand-Pulled Dollies

·         Scissor pallet lifters or Vertical Stackers

·         Lift tables/ workshop lifters

·         Malual labor

 

 

Back to INDEX.


 

 

WHY IS THIS PROBLEM IMPORTANT?

Lifting mechanisms are essential tools for improving efficiency and safety in various tasks. They reduce the risk of injuries caused with labor-intensive lifting and make heavy workloads more manageable with low manpower. Our project addresses these needs by providing a lifting attachment specifically designed for riding lawn mowers—a solution that currently does not exist in the market.

This project is important for several key reasons:

·         Efficiency: It allows users to save time and energy by integrating a lift mechanism directly with a riding lawn mower, streamlining tasks that would otherwise require additional equipment. It allows users to manage heavy loads with speed and care that would not be seen if it had just been them.

·         Safety: By reducing the need for manual lifting, the attachment minimizes the risk of injury, making heavy lifting safer and more accessible for users of all skill levels and situations.

·         Affordability: Unlike many existing lifting solutions, which are often out of reach for the average consumer due to high costs, this attachment is designed to be cost-effective, offering a budget-friendly alternative to expensive and large machinery.

·         User-Friendly Design: The attachment features an intuitive design that is easy to install and operate, ensuring accessibility for a wide range of users. And eliminating the need for any specific training needed to operate other larger machines.

Our goal is to fill a gap in the market by delivering a product that is efficient, affordable, and safe. By focusing on these principles, we aim to create a practical solution that benefits homeowners, hobbyists, and professionals alike.

 

 

A diagram of a company

Description automatically generated

Back to INDEX.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OUR PROPOSED SOLUTION

 

One of our proposed solutions is rather straight forward, a combination of multiple designs from various sources of pre-exiting mechanism and machinery. With Indepth knowledge and references covering our project, we concluded that the attachment would be towed, similarly to a trailer, and lift with scissor arms that powered by an actuator, with safety mechanism in the form of sensors for the load and angle.



 

 

 

 

 

Back to INDEX.

 

FROM IDEA TO REALITY

Once we defined a clear solution idea (i.e. concept), we applied our engineering knowledge to transform it into a real product. These were some of the important design challenges and how we approached each one of them:

1.        Rigid attachment or trailer attachment

We needed to decide whether we wanted to approach this project as a rigid attachment that is rigidly attached to the frame of the lawn mower or approach it as a trailer attachment with a hitch. We as a team decided that it was the best option to approach it as a trailer attachment rather than a rigid attachment. This was mostly because of the rough terrain that the lawn mower is usually operated on. We would have to consider the impact factor that occurs on the bending and torsional forces, which will depend on the terrain that the lawn mower is operating in. On the other hand, the trailer attachment will only have forces acting on the hitch, which is the only point of contact. Another reason why we chose the trailer attachment is because the riding lawn mower will help act as counterweight when the lifting mechanism has a load.

2.        Getting the correct measurements for the frame of the platform

Since we decided to go with a scissor lift, one of the main issues we ran into was getting the right measurements of the frame for the platform. Getting the measurements wasn't really the issue, but we also didn't want to end up with a huge trailer attachment. Our desired height was 4ft, which meant that the scissor lift arms had to be over 4ft long. This would require us to have a trailer that is longer than 4ft, for a riding lawn mower that is only about 4ft long. We ended up approaching this issue by looking at designs that included multiple sections of a scissor lift, rather than just a single section.

3.       Getting the lifting platform to touch the ground

In the first prototype we created, we decided to add a set of wheels with an axle running across. The main issue we ran into was that the platform was not able to touch the ground. Ideally, we wanted it to be able to touch the ground so that the user doesn't have to pick up from the ground (this is where most lifting injuries occur) to load it up on the platform. If the platform is touching the ground, the user can easily slide or roll the load onto the platform. Later the wheels were moved to be simply under the frame without an axile. This meant that the platform can now easily touch the ground. This was accomplished by the “bucket” design shown in the proposed solution section above.

4.       Choosing what lifting mechanism to use

Our team was able to find many different lifting mechanisms which included hydraulics, airbags, pulley system, rack & pinion, etc. There were many things that had to be considered such as load capacity, availability, accessibility, speed, precision and cost. After evaluating these to ensure optimal performance, the team left two options open which include a hydraulic lift or a pulley system. The hydraulic lift would be ideal, but we are not sure we can afford it with the current budget that we have. The pulley system gives us a cheap alternative. Close to when the team was makeing final decision on the project an actuator from the school became available and the team jumped at the idea of integrating into our design. And, as you can see it was part of our final design for this project.

5.       Material selection for key parts

The team decided that this design would be broken up into parts. Those parts or vital to the function of this project, and they included the frame, the platform, and the scissor arms. Choosing the right material and its dimensions is crucial to the durability, the robustness, and the cost effectiveness of the project. This is why the decision the team reached was that of using standard rectangular A500 steel for the frame and the arms, and for the platform it was decided that the frame of the platform would be make out of steel, but the platform would be plywood to keep the cost within limits.

6.       Safety

Safety refers to the safety of the user in this case. This was in the design from the beginning and was one of the foremost ideas that was integral to the design. Even though the design of the project has gone through many iterations the safety that it would provide was the key to making this a viable product and did not go through many changes. The safety comes from only allowing the project function within certain thresholds, specifically focusing on the max load the platform and arms can Hande and the tilt that the total machine can take. With a couple of sensors to monitor these changes and control the actuator the machine becomes safe to handle.

 

 

Back to INDEX.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROTOTYPE EARLY AND OFTEN

We found that physical prototyping was very helpful to increase our understanding of the problem and the feasibility of our solutions. Our first prototypes were simple but useful and we continued evolving into more complex ones.

This was our first prototype, it may be simple, but it helped us understand some major flaws with our design. The main issue that was found was that this design didn't allow the platform to touch the ground. This was a major issue since we wanted to avoid the user having to lift anything up in order for the lifting mechanism to be loaded. Most lifting injuries occur when the load is being lifted from the ground, so this became a major issue that had to be addressed. Another issue with this design was the swivel wheels. These wheels would most likely not give the trailer enough traction to be riding offroad, so we decided to look for alternatives.

 

 

This is our second prototype, which helped us understand that the scissor lift is not a viable option for us. This is because of the way the scissor lift works; it will not be possible for the platform to touch the ground. This was a key takeaway because we had to look for an alternative lifting mechanism.

This is our third prototype, it is still relatively simple, but it helped us understand that the placement of the support beams is crucial to this design. If the support beams are placed like shown above, the platform acts like a cantilever beam. It will be exposed to too many bending moments which will lead to it failing. This was a crucial finding because it allowed us to move the support beams more towards the middle, which would help relief those bending stresses that would occur.

This was our junkyard prototype, which helped us learn that the design with one screw jack wasn’t viable. Originally, we planned to have two screw jacks, one on each support beam. This idea was quickly eliminated due to our budget. If we went with two screw jacks, it would have taken a big portion on our budget, so we decided to try it with one to see if it would work. After creating the prototype, we quickly found out that this idea was not viable. This was due to the bending stresses that were placed on the screw. We noticed that having only one screw jack would put most of the weight on the screw, which is not ideal.

Besides prototyping the actual mechanism for lifting the load and keeping it stable, another section where prototyping took place was with the electronic system and its safety features. From simply having a display show the warring of tipping, or taking the values from the gyroscope and having them be readable this section was less of multiple different prototypes but rather taking our ideas and implementing them with what was already in place. The system ended up being rather simple, still in need of some optimization and workarounds but on its way to integrating with the mechanical aspects of the project.

A circuit board with wires and wires

Description automatically generated

Back to INDEX.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINAL PRODUCT

Our lifting attachment for riding lawn mowers is the product of multiple design, many tests, and iteration. This final product combines functionality, durability, and user-friendly features, addressing the needs of homeowners, landscapers, and professionals alike. While the core design and functionality are complete, a few minor details are still being refined to ensure the best user experience. Key features are present like the robust frame, compact scissor mechanism, intuitive controls, safety functions, and the attachment system.

Specifications:

·         Max load: 200 lb.

o   Safety factor of 3

·         Max lifting height: 36 in

·         Weight: to be determined

·         Power Requirements: 12V battery

·         Platform size: 4.5 ft x 3 ft

 

In Progress:

·         Final testing of mechanism

·         Integration of electronics system

·         Possible addition of coating to resist corrosion

Back to INDEX.

 

 

 

 

 

 

FUTURE WORK

This project has come to an end with this final prototype, there are still a few things to finish for the final presentation but there are details. Some of the future work that the product needs to be complete is:

·         The wheel placement on the frame

·         Completion of the platform

·         Installation of the electronics system

o   Including a power inverter for the actuator

·         Any other detail for presentation

Besides this the project could be taken further in several ways:

·         Making the product smaller or bigger

·         Detaching from the lawn mower and having it be its own machine

·         Wireless control

 

Back to INDEX.


 

 

IN CONCLUSION

For this project, our aim is to create a product that is versatile, compact, robust, and, most importantly, makes life easier for its users. We are confident in our ability to meet and exceed these objectives. We remain committed to delivering an innovative solution that addresses the needs of our target audience.

The team is currently in the final stages of the project, this means that the project is about to be completed. This is not the final product but the final prototype, this marks the end of our senior design. This is a milestone and the culmination of our journey though many months of hard work, testing different ideas, and refinement of those ideas. “There is a thousand ways to skin a cat” this quote stuck with the team all throughout this project, and in the time that we spent on this project it became very real and important to the team. We believe that our solution is a balance of versatility, robustness, affordability, and practicality and the team is confident that the product achieves the goal we set out in the biggening.

We hope you have enjoyed reading about our work and experience, we thank all of you for your time.

 

Back to INDEX.

 

REFERENCES

1910.178 - powered industrial trucks. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (n.d.). https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.178

Home. Arduino. (n.d.). https://www.arduino.cc/

 

Back to INDEX.

 

LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR DESIGN PROCESS

We went through a meticulous design process to arrive to the final solution. The information on this page is a summary intended for the public. To learn about the project details, contact Dr. Noe Vargas Hernandez at noe.vargas@utrgv.edu

 

Back to INDEX.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The team received help from various people, their help was critical to our success, we would like to acknowledge the following for their advice, help, time, and patience with Senior Design Team 6. Thank you all[nv2] 

·         Dr. Benitez

·         Dr. Vargas

·         Mr. Potter

 

Back to INDEX.

 

 


 [nv1]Make a summary of important background research information using bullets. Include pictures, graphs, figures, and/or videos as needed.

Don’t forget to include References in the body of the text (ASME style) and list in the Reference section at the end.

 [nv2]Make sure you acknowledge faculty, staff and anyone that helped you along the way.